Skip to content
NORTH SEA ALLIANCEschedule3 min readpublicEurope

Nine Coastal Nations Interconnect a Supergrid to Share Surpluses

In an illustrative scenario, nine coastal nations link offshore wind farms with undersea cables to share surplus power. We explain how the interconnection works and what could slow it.

JR
Julian Rossi

Cities & Infrastructure Reporter (illustrative byline) •

Illustrative image
verified

Label: launch-edition scenario

This story is an illustrative scenario written for the launch of LiveTrue News World. It is not a report of real events, and figures are attributed to the fictional organizers described. See our scoring scale and Transparency Charter.

KEY TAKEAWAYSThree things to know
1

Nine nations, one connected grid

Undersea cables let coastal countries share wind surpluses and cover each other's calm days.

2

Direct current travels far

High-voltage direct-current links move power efficiently over long sea routes.

3

Cables, costs and consent

Cost, local opposition and supply security remain the hard parts.

The wind does not blow evenly. On one stretch of coast, turbines may spin flat out while, a few hundred kilometres away, the air is still. For years that mismatch meant wasted energy in one place and expensive backup power in another. In the illustrative scenario that follows, nine coastal nations have decided to fix it by linking their offshore wind farms and national grids with undersea cables, so that a surplus in one place can serve a shortage in another.

Launch edition note: the alliance, the nations and the figures are fictional. The scenario is used to show how LiveTrue reports on energy cooperation and names no real agency or company.

How the sea becomes a power line

Alternating current, the kind used in homes, loses energy over very long distances, especially in cables under water. High-voltage direct current, or HVDC, loses far less, which is why it is the technology of choice for long undersea links. At each end of a cable, a converter station changes between the grid's alternating current and the cable's direct current.

The scenario's alliance plans a network of such cables connecting offshore wind farms to several countries at once, instead of linking each farm only to its own shore. Engineers call this a meshed grid. It is more complicated to build and operate than a set of separate lines, but it offers more routes for power to flow and greater resilience if a cable fails.

Why share surpluses

  • Smoothing out the wind. Weather systems cross a sea region over hours, so the windy spot keeps moving. A connected network can pass the supply along.
  • Using more of what is generated. Without export links, wind farms may have to shut down when local demand is low. Interconnectors give surplus power a destination.
  • Lower backup needs. If neighbors can help each other, each country needs less standby generation.

"Think of it as a village well. When the well is shared, a dry season in one yard is not a disaster for the whole street." — a grid planner on the alliance's technical team

How power would be traded

When one country has more power than it needs, its price falls, and neighbors with higher prices buy the difference through the cable. Rules decide who has priority when the cables are full, how the revenue is split and how emergencies are handled. In the scenario, the nations are creating a shared operating body to coordinate, with national grid operators retaining control over their own systems.

The obstacles

  1. Cost. Cables, converter stations and offshore platforms are among the most expensive pieces of energy infrastructure. Financing depends on stable rules and a clear way to recover the cost.
  2. Supply security. Governments worry about relying on neighbors for power, and about the vulnerability of undersea assets to damage or sabotage. Redundant routes and monitoring help, but add cost.
  3. Local opposition. Landing points, converter stations and onshore lines cross communities, which may object on grounds of landscape, fishing or property.
  4. Fairness. A country that hosts the cables and farms may not receive a proportionate share of the benefit unless the rules are written carefully.
  5. Standards. Equipment from different makers must work together. Disagreements about technical standards can delay projects by years.

What the alliance claims, and what is not yet shown

The alliance says it has agreed on a shared plan, a governance framework and the first group of cable routes. It has not yet built the network. Claims about savings or emissions reductions are projections based on models, and models depend on assumptions about future demand, prices and weather. They should be read as estimates and checked as real data comes in.

Environmental and social questions

Offshore construction affects the sea floor, marine life and fishing grounds. The alliance says it will carry out environmental assessments and consult fishing communities on cable routes, but the details of compensation are unsettled. Critics quoted in the scenario say consultation too often comes after design decisions, and they ask that it begin earlier.

What to watch next

  • Financing agreements for the first cables.
  • Publication of the rules on priority, pricing and emergencies.
  • Environmental assessments and responses from coastal communities.
  • Progress on common equipment standards.

A shared grid is an old idea given new urgency by wind power. If the alliance can turn agreement into cable, the sea between nine countries may become less a boundary than a shared resource, one that keeps the lights on in both calm weather and storms.

JR

Written by

Julian Rossi

Cities & Infrastructure Reporter. Launch-edition bylines are illustrative desk personas. About the desks • Report an error

Keep reading

More from World & Peace

See allarrow_forward