Skip to content
handshake

Solution-Oriented Ethics Pledge

The pledge that every problem story at LiveTrue also looks honestly at the response.

The Solution-Oriented Ethics Pledge is the short promise at the center of LiveTrue News World. It exists because journalism that stops at alarm can leave readers feeling helpless, and journalism that skips the hard parts can leave them misled. We aim to avoid both failures.

The pledge

  1. No alarm without exploration of responses. If a story describes a crisis, it also examines at least one real attempt to address it, even if that attempt has failed.
  2. No despair for its own sake. We do not choose headlines or images to maximize fear. Serious subjects get serious, calm treatment.
  3. No cheerleading. A response that works is described with its costs, its limits and the people it has not reached.
  4. No cherry-picked evidence. We report findings that complicate our own framing and say when the evidence is thin.
  5. No hidden persuasion. We do not accept payment to shape coverage, and we do not publish promotional content dressed as reporting.

What it looks like in a story

A typical LiveTrue story has four visible parts. It opens with the problem in concrete terms. It describes the response and who is carrying it out. It weighs the evidence, including what the people involved admit they do not know. And it closes with what to watch next, so readers know how to judge the response as time passes. The structure is deliberately plain: the aim is to be useful, not clever.

What we refuse to do

  • Run stories whose only message is that things are fine.
  • Attach invented statistics to real organizations or real people.
  • Present a pilot project as a proven cure.
  • Give medical, legal or financial advice. We explain subjects; we do not tell individuals what to do.
  • Use emotional manipulation to drive clicks, from countdown pressure to outrage bait.

Tension is part of the job

Sometimes the honest conclusion is that a response is not working. Sometimes a problem has no promising response yet. In those cases the pledge does not require us to invent a hopeful ending. It requires us to say what has been tried, what the obstacles are and what would change the picture. That is still constructive, because it shows readers where the gap is.

Launch edition note

The stories currently on the site are illustrative scenarios written to demonstrate this approach. They show the format of the pledge in action, but they do not describe real projects or real results. When real reporting begins, the same pledge will apply to it.

If you see a story that breaks the pledge, tell us at [email protected]. Specific examples help us more than general complaints, and we will take them seriously.

Last updated 2026-10-04